A Bold Broadcast: Critiquing a Senator's Military Move
A well-known commentator has ignited a heated debate after criticizing a senator's public remarks regarding military personnel and the Commander in Chief.
Background and Criticism
The commentator, who has no military service but has family and friends in the armed forces, strongly disagreed with Senator Mark Kelly's suggestion that military personnel should disregard orders from the Commander in Chief.
Key Points of Contention
- Constitutional Procedures: The commentator argued that the senator should have followed proper constitutional procedures instead of addressing the military directly.
- Lack of Evidence: They questioned the senator's motives and the absence of evidence supporting the claim that the Commander in Chief had given illegal orders.
- Potential Consequences: The commentator emphasized the risks of such statements, noting that the military operates under different rules than civilian courts and that the senator's actions could undermine the chain of command.
Hypocrisy and Proper Channels
The commentator also raised concerns about the senator's past actions, suggesting hypocrisy in his current stance. They questioned why the senator made such a public statement without clear evidence or a formal process.
Final Statement
The commentator concluded that the senator had crossed a line and that his actions were not in line with the proper constitutional process. They argued that the senator should have addressed his concerns through the appropriate channels rather than making a public statement.
