politicsconservative

A New Judge in Town: What You Need to Know About Eric Tung

Los Angeles, USAWednesday, September 24, 2025
Advertisement

Background

  • Name: Eric Tung
  • Current Role: Lawyer from Los Angeles
  • Nomination: Judge on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Replacing: Judge Sandra Segal Ikuta
  • Known For:
  • Strong conservative views
  • Work in the crypto industry
  • Competitive shooting
  • Catholic faith

Nomination Details

  • Picked By: President Trump
  • Supported By: Mike Davis, a key figure in Trump's legal circle
  • Trump's Statement: Called Tung a "Tough Patriot" who will uphold the rule of law in liberal states like California, Oregon, and Washington.

Controversies and Opposition

  • Criticism From: Senator Alex Padilla
  • Concern: Tung's views on the Constitution could lead to inequality and exclude many Americans from equal justice.
  • Tradition Ignored: Senators from a nominee's home state could historically block a nomination, but Trump has ignored this tradition.

Professional Background

  • Education:
  • Yale
  • University of Chicago Law School
  • Clerked For:
  • Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Neil Gorsuch
  • Work Experience:
  • Law firm Jones Day, which has ties to the Trump Justice Department.

Reactions to Nomination

  • Supporting Groups:
  • National Asian Pacific American Bar Assn.
  • Judicial Crisis Network
  • Opposing Groups:
  • Alliance for Justice
  • Demand Justice

Impact on the 9th Circuit

  • If Confirmed: Trump's 11th appointment to the 9th Circuit.
  • Court History: Known for liberal leanings, but Trump has been changing that.
  • Controversial Decisions by Other Trump Judges:
  • Allowed the military to be deployed on American streets.
  • Paused the refugee program.

Personal Views and Stances

  • Religious Liberty: Strong views.
  • Affirmative Action: Opposes.
  • Anti-Abortion Movement: Involved with his wife, Emily Lataif.
  • Confirmation Hearings:
  • Avoided answering some questions, which some senators found suspicious.
  • Wouldn't say whether he thought landmark cases like Obergefell vs. Hodges and Lawrence vs. Texas were decided correctly.
  • Believes in the 1967 case Loving vs. Virginia, which legalized interracial marriage, because he and his wife are an interracial couple.

Actions