What appeared as a done deal just days ago is now up in the air. Speaker Mike Johnson's stopgap bill, which combined a six-month continuing resolution with a contentious bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote, is off the table - at least for now. 

 But what really happened behind the scenes? The Speaker's initial enthusiasm gave way to a last-minute pivot, citing the need for consensus-building. 

 So, what changed? Was it a wave of backlash from constituents, or did the Speaker's own party members start to lose confidence? 

 The move signals a major defeat for the Speaker's vision, but it also buys him time to regroup and recalibrate. What will be the next strategy? Will he opt for a more moderate approach, or double down on the conservative flank? 

 Meanwhile, the Senate remains quiescent, with Democrats holding the line on their stance. If the House GOP leadership continues to defy the odds, will they get traction with the Senate, or will the whole effort stall out? 

 It's clear that the House GOP leadership has some soul-searching to do. As the Speaker navigates the treacherous landscape of congressional politics, we're left pondering the motivations behind this sudden shift. 

 One thing is certain, however: the stakes are high, and the path forward is far from clear. As we wait for the next move, one question looms large: who will blink first, and what will be the ultimate cost of this game of political chicken?

A Stopgap Measure in Jeopardy: What's Behind the Speaker's Changed Tack?

Actions