America's Highest Court: A Fix in Progress

The Supreme Court is starting a new term, and many people are worried that it’s out of touch with what the American public wants. For years, the court has been leaning heavily to the right, with some justices known for pushing their own agendas. This is especially clear in cases like the recent Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade and was likely influenced by justices handpicked by former President Donald Trump. The Biden administration has suggested changes, like adding term limits and a strict code of conduct to deal with recent ethical issues involving justices Alito and Thomas. However, fixing the court is tricky in a two-party system. What helps one party today might hurt it tomorrow. Presidents usually just wait for a justice to retire or step down. So, how can we make sure powerful offices like the Supreme Court are accountable? How can we fix the court without making it depend on the other branches of government? These are tough questions to answer. One possible solution is to make small changes to the impeachment process.

In the past, court packing has been used to change the court's direction. Abraham Lincoln added justices to create an anti-slavery majority. However, this power can be used by any party, and it’s no longer a popular idea. It's also hard to set term limits for justices through a constitutional amendment, especially when one party has worked hard to appoint the current justices. Impeachment is another option, but it rarely happens. Only 15 federal judges have been impeached, with only one Supreme Court justice, Samuel Chase, being impeached in 1804. He was acquitted, so the process didn't change much. Maybe we could change the impeachment process to make it clearer. For example, we could use the Supreme Court's own ethics code to define what is considered a high crime or misdemeanor. This might make the process fairer and more useful. Without a clear solution, we might have to keep doing what we’ve always done: wait for a justice to leave and then appoint a new one. This means hoping for the best, but it’s not always the best way.

Actions