Academic books are often overlooked when it comes to measuring their impact.  Microsoft Academic is a powerful tool that can help.  It is a vast database that can track citations for academic books.  It has been proven to be useful for tracking citations for journal articles.  It is now being tested to see if it can do the same for academic books.

A recent study took a closer look.  It compared citation counts for 16, 463 academic books from 2013 to 2016.  The books were from the Book Citation Index (BKCI).  The study compared these counts to those from Microsoft Academic and Google Books.  The study covered 17 different fields.

The study found that about 60% of the books in the BKCI had records in Microsoft Academic.  This number varied depending on the year and the field of study.  Microsoft Academic found more citations than the BKCI in nine subject areas.  This was true for all years for books that were indexed by both.  The difference in citation counts was significant.  Microsoft Academic found 1. 5 to 3. 6 times more citations than the BKCI.

The reason for this difference is clear.  Microsoft Academic indexes more scholarly publications.  It also combines citations from different editions and chapters of books.  This gives a more complete picture of a book's impact.  In contrast, the BKCI only found more citations than Microsoft Academic for books in three fields.  This was true for the years 2013 and 2014.

Microsoft Academic also outperformed Google Books.  It found more citations in six fields for all years.  This shows that Microsoft Academic is a valuable tool.  It can be used to assess the impact of academic books.  However, it is important to note that Microsoft Academic may not provide comprehensive coverage.  It is still a useful tool when thorough coverage is not essential.

The study highlights the importance of using multiple sources.  It is not enough to rely on a single database.  Using multiple sources can provide a more accurate picture.  It can help researchers understand the true impact of academic books.  This is especially true when assessing the impact of academic books.  It is a complex task that requires a nuanced approach.

The study also raises questions about the role of different databases.  It shows that Microsoft Academic is a powerful tool.  However, it is not the only tool available.  Researchers should consider using multiple databases.  This can help them get a more complete picture of a book's impact.

The study also highlights the importance of critical thinking.  It is not enough to accept the results of a single study.  Researchers should question the methods used.  They should also consider the limitations of the study.  This can help them make more informed decisions.

The study also raises questions about the future of academic book citation tracking.  It shows that Microsoft Academic is a valuable tool.  However, it is not the only tool available.  Researchers should consider using multiple databases.  This can help them get a more complete picture of a book's impact.  It can also help them make more informed decisions about the future of academic book citation tracking.

Are Academic Books Getting the Credit They Deserve?

Actions