Imagine you're a detective in a small town. You're investigating a case where a young girl saw her mother's murder. You're trying to figure out if her memory is real or if she's just recalling something she was told. A study asked real legal professionals like judges, lawyers, and police officers to look at this case. They gave these professionals a story to read, changing the age of the girl and whether she mentioned the crime on her own or if someone told her to. Surprisingly, the professionals were more likely to think the memory was real if the girl was 6 years old instead of 22. They also thought the girl was more reliable when she talked about the crime after being reminded by her grandmother. The study shows that legal professionals aren't very aware of how age can affect false memories. This could lead to wrong decisions in real cases.

There were 102 professionals from Sweden, Norway, and the Netherlands who took part in this online study. They rated different parts of the case, like how believable the witness was and whether they thought the memory was true or false. The study found that professionals tended to trust younger witnesses more and were more inclined to ask for help from a memory expert when dealing with younger witness statements. This study highlights the need for more training for legal professionals about how age affects memory accuracy.

Assessing Legal Professionals' Knowledge on Age and False Memories

Actions