Canada's Pesticide Problem: Time for a Change
A coalition of nearly 30 organizations is advocating for a shift in Canada's approach to pesticide regulation. They urge the government to abandon plans that could weaken pesticide rules, which were outlined in the recent budget. The group warns that these changes could negatively impact farmers, public health, and the environment.
Key Concerns
Reduction in Regular Pesticide Checks: The group is alarmed by the government's plan to discontinue routine pesticide assessments, which are crucial for ensuring safety. Without these checks, regulations may further favor large chemical companies.
Overdue Review of Pesticide Law: The current pesticide law requires a review every seven years, but the last review was conducted in 2015. The group emphasizes the need for an immediate and comprehensive review.
Glyphosate Controversy: Recent issues with glyphosate, a widely used herbicide, highlight potential flaws in current regulations. A study from years ago claimed glyphosate was safe, but it was later revealed that the study was authored by the company that manufactures it. New research suggests glyphosate may cause cancer in animals and possibly in humans.
Demands for Change
The coalition has outlined four key demands for the government:
Update Pesticide Assessment Methods: Ensure evaluations are based on the latest scientific research and real-world usage.
Maintain Regular Safety Checks: Continue routine assessments to confirm the ongoing safety of pesticides.
Conduct a Comprehensive Review: Perform a thorough review of the pesticide law to ensure it is as effective as possible.
Reassess Glyphosate: Conduct a special review of glyphosate and suspend its use until its safety is confirmed.
Conclusion
The group argues that Canada's current pesticide regulations are inadequate. They do not evaluate the entire product, focusing only on the active ingredient, and do not incorporate the most recent scientific advancements. The coalition calls for stronger, safer regulations to protect farmers, public health, and the environment.
