Canoeist Faces Charges After Touching the Reflecting Pool

A former Olympic paddler, David Hearn, is fighting a felony accusation that he damaged the Lincoln Memorial’s Reflecting Pool by pulling at a new sealant installed there. The claim was made after he allegedly grabbed a piece of the “American‑flag blue” coating that still clung to the pool’s bottom. Hearn says he only touched it and did not tear or break anything. The case began when the U. S. Attorney’s Office, led by Jeanine Pirro, filed a single felony charge of property destruction on July 2. Prosecutors argue that Hearn’s actions caused about two square feet of damage, citing witnesses who saw him violently lift the liner. Video footage shows Hearn being handcuffed next to his bike, laughing about the peeled‑back lining. Defense lawyer Norm Eisen counters that touching water is not a crime and frames the prosecution as political. He points out that Hearn has long lived in Washington, D. C. , and describes him as an “upstanding” citizen. Eisen claims the case is part of a broader effort to scapegoat Hearn and deflect responsibility from higher officials.

Hearn’s court appearance was brief. Judge Carmen McLean accepted his not‑guilty plea and declined to impose a stay‑away order, allowing him to remain free on recognizance. The next court date is set for August 5, with a possible trial not until February 2027. The incident comes amid ongoing renovations at the pool. More than $16 million has already been spent on repairs, and the Interior Secretary confirmed that crews had to drain the 6. 75‑million‑gallon pool twice in three months for maintenance and algae removal. The new sealant was applied by Atlantic Industrial Coatings, the same company chosen for earlier repairs. President Trump’s administration has claimed that several people were cited or arrested for vandalism, including a supposed 350‑foot cut allegedly made with a knife. The administration blames vandalism for the algae bloom, though the federal government has dealt with such growths since the pool’s opening in 1922. The case highlights tensions over how public landmarks are protected and who is held accountable for accidental damage. Whether Hearn’s actions will be deemed criminal remains to be decided, but the debate over property rights and governmental authority is already heating up.

Actions