Colorado's 2025: A Year of Legal Wake-Up Calls

In 2025, Colorado's lawmakers faced a series of legal setbacks that highlighted their apparent ignorance of basic constitutional principles. The First Amendment, a cornerstone of American freedoms, was at the heart of these disputes.

The First Amendment Under Fire

It's surprising that in a modern democracy, elected officials need reminders that the government cannot force people to express certain views or censor others. This amendment also protects the right to practice one's religion without government interference.

Case 1: Gas Stove Manufacturers and Forced Speech

One notable case involved a law requiring gas stove manufacturers to include specific health warnings. A federal judge blocked this law, arguing that it forced manufacturers to convey a message they might not agree with. The judge pointed out that the scientific community itself is divided on the issue, making the government's stance questionable.

"This case should serve as a reminder that laws should not coerce speech but rather encourage open dialogue."

Case 2: Counselors and Restricted Speech

Another case involved a counselor who challenged a law restricting her ability to provide certain types of therapy. The Supreme Court's questioning suggested that this law might infringe on her First Amendment rights.

"It's crucial for lawmakers to understand that they cannot dictate what professionals can or cannot say to their clients."

Religious Freedoms in the Spotlight

Religious freedoms also took center stage in 2025.

Case 3: Exclusion from Preschool Programs

The Supreme Court received numerous briefs supporting a case brought by Catholic parishes and families. These families argued that they were unfairly excluded from a state preschool program because of their religious beliefs.

"This case underscores the importance of religious neutrality in government programs."

Case 4: Christian Summer Camp and Biological Sex Policies

Additionally, a Christian summer camp successfully challenged a law that would have forced it to compromise its policies on biological sex. The state eventually updated its guidelines to exempt religious organizations from such requirements.

"This case highlights the need for the government to respect the religious practices of its citizens."

A Call for Constitutional Literacy

These legal battles could have been avoided if lawmakers had a better understanding of the First Amendment. By familiarizing themselves with key court decisions, they can craft laws that respect constitutional freedoms.

"It's time for Colorado's leaders to do their homework and uphold the principles that protect all citizens."