Have you ever looked up at the moon and wondered how old it is? As it turns out, scientists have been debating this for a while now. A new study suggests that the moon might be way older than we previously thought. In the past, scientists believed that the moon formed after a giant impact around 4. 35 billion years ago. However, this new research is shaking things up. The study, led by Professor Francis Nimmo, argues that the moon’s surface rocks aren't telling the whole story. Instead of marking the moon's birth, these rocks show a later heating event that melted the moon's surface about 4. 51 billion years ago. This could mean the moon is 100 million years older than we thought! How did this happen? Well, as the moon was moving away from Earth, gravitational forces heated it up, like squeezing a rubber ball. This heat hid the moon's real age. Some puzzlingly old minerals, called zircon, found in the moon’s surface might be clues supporting this view. Upcoming moon missions, like China’s Chang’e 6 and NASA’s Artemis, could unravel more of our celestial neighbor’s secrets. Planetary scientist Carsten Münker from the University of Cologne thinks this study is a big step forward. While the age difference seems small, understanding these early days is crucial for figuring out how our solar system got its shape.

Earth's Moon: Older Than We Thought?

Actions