Ever wondered who has the right to challenge decisions made by Chile's Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Agency (SMA)? Laws in Chile, specifically N° 20. 417 and 20. 600, state that only those directly affected by a decision can take it to the Environmental Court. But what does "directly affected" really mean?

We'll dive into how the Second Environmental Court has been interpreting this rule for individuals and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). It's more than just about who can sue. It's about environmental justice and making sure the right people are involved from the start, not just at the end when the decision is already made.

Imagine this: you live near a factory that's polluting the air. You're affected, right? But what if you don't live close enough? Can you still challenge the decision? This is where things get tricky. The court has to decide who's really affected and who can stand up for the environment.

Environmental justice isn't just about who can sue. It's about fairness and making sure everyone has a say. It's about timing too. People should be involved early, not just at the last minute.

So, who gets to fight for Chile's environment? It turns out, it's not always straight-forward.

Facing the Courts: Who Can Fight for Chile's Environment?

Actions