Faith in the Curriculum: Oklahoma's Unconstitutional Push to Teach the Bible

The recent directive issued by Oklahoma's State Superintendent Ryan Walters ordering the inclusion of the Bible in lessons for grades 5-12 has sparked widespread controversy. While Walters claims that the Bible is an "indispensable historical and cultural touchstone," critics argue that it is a clear violation of the U.S. Constitution's Establishment Clause. But let's pause for a moment and ask: what if this assumption is wrong? What if the Bible is not necessarily the most relevant or important historical and cultural touchstone for Oklahoma students? What if, in fact, it is a narrow and exclusive perspective that may not accurately reflect the diversity of the state's student body? The order, which is compulsory and demands "immediate and strict compliance," has been met with immediate condemnation from civil rights groups and advocates for the separation of church and state. Phil Bacharach, a spokesperson for the state Attorney General, claims that Oklahoma law already explicitly allows Bibles in the classroom, but it's unclear if Walters has the authority to mandate their teaching.

Interestingly, the directive comes at a time when conservative-led states are making a concerted effort to target public schools. Louisiana has required schools to post the Ten Commandments in classrooms, while others are under pressure to teach the Bible and ban books and lessons about race, sexual orientation, and gender identity. But isn't this an abuse of power? Doesn't it amount to a form of "Christian Nationalism" that Walters is imposing on everyone else's children? As Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, so aptly put it, "Public schools are not Sunday schools." The directive has also been criticized by the head of the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, who called it a clear violation of the Constitution. "We adamantly oppose any requirements that religion be forcefully taught or required as a part of lesson plans in public schools," Adam Soltani said. So what does this mean for Oklahoma students? Are they going to be forced to learn about the Bible whether they want to or not? Is this an attempt to impose a narrow and exclusive worldview on them? And what about the students who don't share this worldview? Don't they deserve an education that reflects their own experiences and perspectives?

Actions