The Middle East conflict has been marked by daring operations and tragic human errors. From Hamas' cross-border attacks to the Israeli military's bold hostage rescues, and from Houthi missiles hitting Tel Aviv to Israel's remote detonation of Hezbollah commanders' pagers, these events have significantly shaped the conflict. But what's at the core of these operations is a common thread: human error. 

Time and again, both sides have failed to learn from their mistakes. The Israeli military's failure to respond quickly to Hamas' attack on October 7th is a stark example of this. Despite early warnings from female soldiers stationed at the Gaza border, their concerns were ignored, leading to devastating consequences. It took weeks for the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to fully mobilize, a failure that exposed critical vulnerabilities. 

The same mistakes have been repeated on the other side as well. Hezbollah, for instance, launched a critical miscalculation by overlooking one of Israel's most daring and technically sophisticated operations. The pager plot, which killed 37 Hezbollah fighters and wounded more than 3,400, was a significant failure in Hezbollah's planning.

The importance of human judgment cannot be overstated. Despite advances in technology and data, it's essential to recognize and quantify uncertainties. This is where concepts like the 'margin of error' come into play. By acknowledging and understanding these uncertainties, we can build fail-safe systems, question assumptions, and use 'red teaming' to uncover weaknesses.

Forgetting the Formula: Human Error in the Middle East Conflict

Actions