The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) has made headlines, and not for a good reason. They recently endorsed Donald Trump, a man who was found guilty of 34 felony counts of business fraud.  As one reporter put it, 'History made: Fraternal Order of Police just endorsed a criminal.'  But is this really a surprise? After all, Trump has a long history of clashing with law enforcement, going so far as to encourage his supporters to attack the police on January 6th.  So, what's going on here?  Is the FOP turning its back on the very officers it's supposed to represent? 

Think about it: The FOP claims to stand for law and order, yet they're endorsing someone who has been convicted of a crime.  Does this send the message that it's okay to break the law if you're powerful?  What are the long-term consequences of this decision for the FOP's credibility? 

Adding fuel to the fire, Trump has repeatedly stated he would pardon criminals convicted in the January 6th riot, a riot that left dozens of police officers injured and some even dead. This raises a serious question: Does the FOP condone violence against law enforcement?  Or are they simply willing to overlook it in the name of political expediency?  

Remember, Capitol Police Officer Michael Fanone, who was brutally attacked during the January 6th riot, has publicly accused the FOP of failing to reach out to him or other officers who were injured.  Fanone even requested the FOP to denounce the GOP members who voted against awarding Congressional Gold Medals to the officers involved in the Capitol defense. The FOP refused.   

Could this be a sign of deep divisions within law enforcement itself?  The FOP's decision to endorse Trump is a complex and controversial one. It's crucial to critically analyze this move and consider its implications for the future of law enforcement and the public's trust in those who protect us.

Fraternal Order of Police Endorses Criminal:Is This a Betrayal of Trust?

Actions