Freedom’s 250‑Year Legacy: Why Church and State Must Stay Apart

The Fourth of July reminds us that 250 years ago, America chose a path where the government was neither a church nor a king. The founders believed that real liberty is safest when religion and politics do not mix. At the start, only white men could vote, but they still imagined a country run by its citizens, not by priests or monarchs. This idea of separating church and state was key to that experiment. Today, some leaders try to reverse that progress. They have held large prayer meetings at the National Mall, invited senior officials to speak about faith, and used public channels for religious messages. These actions signal a push toward Christian nationalism that seeks to make the United States a home for only certain believers. The founders knew how dangerous religious conflict can be. The Constitution does not mention God and explicitly keeps faith out of government power. It says the nation’s authority comes from “the consent of the governed, ” not from any higher being.

Legislators come from many faiths, and the Constitution bars religious tests for office. This allows Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and non‑believers to all serve in public roles. Separating church from state lets everyone share equal footing. The Supreme Court’s 1992 ruling that ended school‑organized prayer at a public graduation showed how mixing religion and government can alienate those who do not share the chosen faith. It warned that a state endorsement of one religion threatens freedom for all. If we keep faith and politics separate, every citizen—whether religious or not—can work together toward a stronger democracy. President Lincoln’s words at Gettysburg remind us that “a government of the people, by the people, and for the people” will endure only if it respects all beliefs. Reaffirming church‑state separation this Independence Day can protect America’s experiment for the next 250 years and beyond.

Actions