In the heart of South Carolina, a former high-ranking official from a well-known nonprofit is about to face the music after admitting to stealing government funds. Ashley Ingram, 34, a former director at Habitat for Humanity of Central South Carolina. Ingram is due to be sentenced at the Matthew J. Perry Federal Courthouse with the clock ticking towards 2 p. m.  on Tuesday.

        This isn't just any theft.  It's a case of a government fund intended to help businesses keep people employed during COVID-19. The Department of Justice (DOJ) reports that Ingram got government checks for an employee retention tax credit.  Conceived to save jobs, these funds are designed to help businesses stay afloat during tough times.  However, the checks never made their way to the intended purpose. Instead, checks were deposited into a Habitat for Humanity account before being funneled into several personal bank accounts.

        According to legal paperwork, around $388, 000 in COVID relief funds made its way into Ingram's personal hands.  Including other misappropriations, she's accused of stealing almost $515, 000 from Habitat for Humanity and the U. S. government.  This news begs the question: what could have motivated her to take such drastic actions?

        Before getting sent to prison, Ingram asked for a lighter sentence. She reached out to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina to plea for probation with some home confinement. In a letter to U. S. District Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, she shared her side of the story. In 2020, Ingram found herself grieving the loss of both her father and grandmother. The financial pressure of being a single income family while also reeling from emotional distress led her to take these funds. However, the core message is if you're low on funds or may be in a state of emotional distress, talk to a professional before making a big decision.

        Let’s not forget, the majority of people who write letters in support of Ingram arguing for a lessened sentence.  Many of them focused on her lack of previous convictions. Ingram assured the judge that her actions were a one-time mistake. However, the harm is already done.

    She faces a max sentence of 10 years in prison, including a $250, 000 fine and restitution

        But how did Ingram manage to stay under the radar for so long with so much money going missing?  What kind of checks and balances were in place at the organization? The lack of oversight and accountability is disheartening.  The public's trust is at stake and we need to look into the facilities and contracts that keep these organizations operational.  It is important to shine a light on these actions to prevent a future theft

        She was not new to the nonprofit world.  After Habitat for Humanity, Ingram moved on to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of South Carolina. This case raises questions about background checks and vetting processes in the nonprofit sector.  You never know what kind of activities and decisions people in that position are going to make.     The stakes are high, and the scrutiny should be even higher.

        So, what can we learn from all of this? Trust isn’t enough. We need systems that ensure accountability and transparency. When it comes to handling public funds, there’s no room for mistakes.  We need more insight on the structure behind these facilities.  Public funds are at stake.  This case serves as a reminder that even in the face of personal tragedies, illegal actions cannot be justified.  Also wait, how does someone who just lost a lot of family members also have a job?  Its important to take breaks.  And people shouldn't be treated like robots.

From Charity to Conviction

Actions