businessliberal
Los Angeles County Workers Make a Stand
Los Angeles, USAWednesday, April 30, 2025
The county's Chief Executive, Fesia Davenport, had a different perspective. She acknowledged that the county had moved away from the zero raise offer but remained cautious about what they could afford. The county was facing significant financial challenges, and Davenport was concerned about negotiating themselves into a structural deficit. She warned that the county might have to cut positions in the future, similar to what Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass had proposed.
The county had offered SEIU Local 721 members a $5, 000 bonus in the first year of the contract, along with a cost-of-living adjustment and an additional bonus. However, the union saw this as inadequate. Steve Koffroth, SEIU’s chief contract negotiator, accused the county of waiting until the last moment to respond to the union’s first proposal. The previous contract had expired at the end of March, and the union had submitted their proposal before Christmas. Koffroth told the crowd that the county's counteroffer was a "pittance. "
The county had cited wildfire costs, a massive sex abuse settlement, and the loss of federal grants as reasons for their financial constraints. However, union members alleged that the county had spent too much money on outside contract workers rather than filling vacancies. They pointed to a union-led study from December that found the county had spent billions on private firms, creating a "taxpayer-to-private-sector-pipeline. " The county dismissed the report as a misleading negotiation tactic.
The reliance on contractors was particularly evident in healthcare. Union members noted that vacancies were often filled by highly paid contract workers. Theresa Velasco, a community health worker at Rancho Los Amigos, the county rehabilitation hospital, asked, "How would you feel if someone comes into your hospital for three weeks and makes four times your salary and leaves you? "
Actions
flag content