The Pentagon is reconsidering a long‑standing partnership with Scouting America after a series of controversial proposals.  

For years, the U. S. military has supported Scout troops on bases and offered special ranks to young Eagle Scouts who join the armed forces.  

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, however, had signaled a plan to end that relationship.  

He cited the organization’s 2019 move to admit girls and its rebranding as Scouting America, arguing that the group had lost focus on “masculine virtues” and was moving away from spaces he described as “boy‑friendly. ”  

The proposed changes would have stopped Scout troops from meeting on military installations, cut aid for the national Jamboree, and removed a tradition that rewarded enlistment with an advanced rank.  

Scouting America reports that about 25, 000 children of service members currently participate in its programs.  

New documents show the Pentagon is still drafting withdrawal plans, but a confidential source said negotiations are underway to keep the partnership alive.  

A key demand in these talks is that new Scouts must register under their sex assigned at birth, a requirement that conflicts with the organization’s inclusive policy.  

The current Scout application offers only “male” or “female” options, yet the group states it welcomes all youth regardless of gender identity.  

Whether this compromise will satisfy Hegseth or protect transgender participants remains uncertain, as the Department of Defense has not commented.  

Scouting America’s spokesperson declined to speak on the matter.

Hegseth has been outspoken about his opposition to Scouting’s changes, calling them a dilution of the organization’s purpose.  

He has also criticized the group for “cratering itself” and for embracing progressive politics, according to an internal memo that was later denied by the Pentagon as unverified.  

Republican Representative Don Bacon, who serves on the Armed Services Committee, confirmed the Pentagon’s stance and noted strong backlash from constituents in Nebraska.  

He described calls from supporters of former President Trump who were upset by the Secretary’s stance on Scouts.  

On the other side, Democratic Representative Adam Smith condemned the move as an unnecessary cultural push that could deepen divisions.  

He argued that the Department of Defense should not pressure a youth organization in this manner.

The debate highlights a clash between traditional military values and evolving social norms.  

It also raises questions about how the armed forces balance support for youth programs with their own policy goals.  

The outcome will likely influence not only the future of Scouting on military bases but also broader discussions about inclusion and tradition within government agencies.

Military Ties to Scouting: A Shift in Strategy

Actions