In the vast world of people moving from one place to another for work, a big chunk comes from Asia and the Pacific. These migrants often end up in short-term, low-paying jobs, mostly in the Gulf countries. It's a tough world out there for these workers, with issues ranging from unfair labor practices to plain old human right violations.

        Back in 2003, twelve Asian countries decided they'd seen enough of this and formed the Colombo Process. India and Bangladesh were two key players in the group.

        Both countries came from a past where their emigration laws were decided by the colonial rulers. Those old laws had strict categories based on skills, dividing migrants into "high-" and "low-skill" groups. India has kept these categories, while Bangladesh is trying to modernize the system.

        Does who you are dictate where you go? That precise question is what the Colombo Process tried to answer. The organization sought to find a new way to classify skills and to see just how skills are developed.  The CP wanted to see how these categories were formed, how they've continued, and how they might change in the future. The Colombo Process hoped to where migrate-as the maintaining of these category labels and how the international community might veer away from using them.

        So, these migrants leave their home countries for better prospects. But how are skills and opportunities defined?  Where do migrant-origin states play their cards in all this? These countries control the game. They dictate who can move, where, and if they have the skills to do so.

        Is the system fair? A bunch of countries are trying to rejig it. As colossal as the world is, it's an exciting time to think about these changes in the great game of life.

Mingling Migration and Skills

Actions