healthliberal

RFK Jr. and the Cell Phone Controversy: A Closer Look

USAFriday, January 16, 2026
Advertisement

FDA Removes Safety Information

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has recently pushed for a closer examination of cell phone radiation, prompting the FDA to remove its long-standing assertion that cell phones are safe. This move has ignited significant debate, particularly as many health groups still maintain there is no strong evidence linking cell phones to cancer.

Before the change, the FDA website explicitly stated that after nearly 30 years of research, there was no connection between cell phone use and health issues like cancer. The agency even noted that brain cancer rates have declined over the past 15 years, despite increased cell phone usage. However, that information has now been removed, and the page redirects to the main site.

Health Organizations Disagree with Kennedy

Kennedy's position is not supported by major health organizations. The National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society align with the old FDA stance, citing studies—including a large one conducted across 13 countries—that found no link between cell phone use and cancer.

Kennedy's Claims Challenged by Experts

Kennedy has long expressed concerns about Wi-Fi radiation, arguing it is more harmful than commonly believed and can impact the brain. However, experts contend his claims lack substantial scientific backing. They argue that the studies he references involved radiation levels far higher than those emitted by Wi-Fi.

Government Agencies Unchanged

Despite Kennedy's efforts, agencies like the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have not altered their stance. The FCC continues to assert there is no scientific evidence linking cell phone use to cancer or other illnesses.

Critics Question Motives

Some believe Kennedy's call for further research is a tactic to delay meaningful action. Joel Moskowitz, a public health professor, claimed he was offered funding to participate in a study but declined, suggesting the issue is more political than scientific.

A Pattern of Controversial Changes

This is not the first time Kennedy has enacted major changes against expert advice. Just weeks ago, he made substantial revisions to the childhood vaccine schedule, which also faced widespread criticism from experts.

Actions