Brazil's response to the Covid-19 pandemic was anything but straightforward. In 2021, the Brazilian parliament launched a major investigation. The goal was to look into claims that President Jair Bolsonaro ignored expert advice. Worse, he was accused of actively encouraging the spread of the virus. This led to a surge in hospitalizations and deaths. The investigation revealed a lot about how science and politics mix in Brazil.

The investigation uncovered a complex web of claims and counterclaims. Bolsonaro's allies didn't reject science outright. Instead, they positioned themselves as critical thinkers. They argued that they were exposing political interests disguised as facts. They claimed to be supported by unbiased experts. These experts, they said, had more prestige and credibility than those cited by the opposition. In other words, they weren't against modern scientific knowledge. They just claimed to have the best available scientific evidence on their side.

This situation highlights a broader issue. It's not just about science versus politics. It's about how expertise is distributed and how different statements gain authority. It's about how scientific knowledge is used and interpreted in different fields. This is where Science and Technology Studies (STS) comes in. STS has been criticized for blurring the line between opinions and facts. But it also provides tools to understand the complex relations between far-right politics and scientific institutions.

The pandemic response in Brazil shows that so-called 'post-truth politics' doesn't necessarily mean epistemic democratization. It's more about how different groups claim scientific authority. It's about how they use science to support their political agendas. This is a critical point. It's not about blaming STS for the 'post-truth era'. It's about using its tools to understand the complex dynamics at play.

The pandemic has shown us that science is not neutral. It's a tool that can be used and misused. It's important to understand how expertise is distributed. It's important to understand how different statements accumulate authority. It's important to understand how scientific knowledge is enacted across multiple fields of practice.

The pandemic has also shown us that politics and science are intertwined. They influence each other in complex ways. It's not about one side being right and the other being wrong. It's about understanding the dynamics at play. It's about understanding how science and politics interact. It's about understanding how they shape each other.

The pandemic has shown us that we need to engage more critically with science. We need to ask questions. We need to challenge assumptions. We need to understand the complexities involved. This is the only way we can navigate the complex world of science and politics.

Science in the Spotlight: Brazil's Pandemic Politics

Actions