SpaceX and Cards Against Humanity: A Land Dispute Ends Quietly

A recent legal battle between SpaceX and Cards Against Humanity has come to a close, but the details remain under wraps.

The Background

• Cards Against Humanity purchased a piece of land in Texas in 2017 as a playful protest against then-President Donald Trump's border wall plans.
• SpaceX, allegedly, treated the land as their own, placing construction materials and debris without permission.

The Lawsuit

• Cards Against Humanity sued SpaceX, claiming trespassing and damage to the land.
• The company stated that SpaceX admitted to trespassing during the legal process.
• Settlement terms remain private.

The Settlement

• The lawsuit was set to go to trial in early November, but a settlement was reached weeks before.
• Cards Against Humanity mentioned that a trial might have cost more than they could have won.
• SpaceX has removed their equipment from the land, allowing the company to restore it to its natural state.

The Land and Its Significance

• The land was maintained in its natural state, with a "no trespassing" sign to keep people out.
• Cards Against Humanity initially sought $15 million in damages, including loss of vegetation.
• They had hoped to use any winnings to pay back the 150,000 people who contributed $15 each to buy the land.

Broader Implications

This case raises questions about:

• Property rights
• Responsibilities of companies when it comes to land use.
• Power dynamics between large corporations and smaller entities, even when the smaller entity has a significant fan base.