The nation's voting system is under scrutiny again. A coalition of advocacy groups has taken legal action against Donald Trump's recent executive order. This order aims to reshape how Americans vote in federal elections. The lawsuit argues that Trump's moves are overstepping his authority and could disenfranchise millions of voters.

The executive order, signed last week, targets several aspects of the voting process. It requires proof of citizenship when registering to vote and sets stricter deadlines for mail-in ballots. The order also instructs various government agencies to enforce these changes. Critics argue that these measures are unnecessary and could make it harder for eligible voters to participate.

The lawsuit, filed in a federal court in Washington D. C. , names several defendants, including top officials from the Department of Justice and the Department of Defense. The plaintiffs argue that the order violates the separation of powers and undermines the checks and balances that keep elections fair. They also point out that the order could disproportionately affect certain groups, such as military personnel and citizens living abroad.

One of the most contentious parts of the order is the requirement for proof of citizenship. The lawsuit argues that this could disenfranchise many eligible voters who do not have the necessary documents. For instance, only half of Americans possess a passport, and many Real IDs do not indicate citizenship. The order also does not accept identification documents issued by Tribal governments or birth certificates.

The order also takes aim at mail-in voting, making federal funding conditional on states setting a deadline for ballots to be received by Election Day. Critics argue that this could make it harder for citizens abroad and those serving in the military to vote. The lawsuit notes that many states have laws allowing ballots to be counted if they are mailed by Election Day and received afterward. The lawsuit also suggests that the order could make it harder for citizens abroad and those serving in the military to vote.

The lawsuit argues that the order could have a significant impact on voting rights. For example, members of LULAC, a Hispanic and Latin American civil rights organization, could be harmed if some of its members do not have the requisite citizenship documents. The Arizona Students' Association could also be affected, despite the state already requiring proof of citizenship when voters register.

The lawsuit also raises questions about the practicality of the order's requirements. For instance, the order directs the secretary of defense to update the form used by military personnel and citizens abroad to register and request an absentee ballot. The lawsuit argues that this could be "impossible given the format required by Congress. "

In conclusion, the lawsuit argues that the order could have a chilling effect on voter registration and turnout. The plaintiffs hope that the court will block the implementation of the order and force the Trump administration to rescind any guidance they issued. The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for the future of American elections.

The Fight for Fair Voting: Groups Challenge Trump's Election Overhaul

Actions