Imagine sending a package with $42, 000 inside, only to have it seized by police in another state. That's what happened to Henry Cheng, a California jewelry wholesaler. His money was stopped at a FedEx facility in Indiana, and he had to go through a legal battle to get it back.

Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take property they suspect is involved in crime, even without a conviction. In Cheng's case, the money was seized because it was sent from Virginia to California, a state considered a "source" for drugs. The package was also deemed suspicious because it contained different bill denominations and was dropped off at a FedEx center.

Cheng faced a tough challenge. He couldn't afford to hire a lawyer and travel to Indiana for the court case. Luckily, a public interest law firm, the Institute for Justice, took up his case. They argued that civil forfeiture threatens property rights and lets governments keep seized money without charging the owner with a crime.

After months of legal fights and media attention, Cheng finally got his money back. But the story doesn't end there. The law firm filed a class action lawsuit against the constitutionality of the asset seizure process. They want to make sure others don't face the same struggle.

The Fight for Lost Cash: A Man's $42K Seized and Returned

Actions