The Fight Over Climate Science: Who Decides What's True?

In recent times, the debate over climate science has become a battleground.

The U.S. Perspective

• Critics argue that the Trump administration is attempting to silence climate science, drawing parallels to the Soviet Union under Stalin.
• Supporters contend that the administration is merely trying to stop the spread of biased information and ensure fair and open scientific practices.

The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), established over 50 years ago, has been a focal point of this debate.

• Critics claim it's a place where scary stories about the future are concocted.
• Supporters argue the administration is promoting transparency and fairness in science.

Others fear the administration is suppressing discussions on climate change, limiting who can participate in the conversation.

A Global Phenomenon

The debate extends beyond the United States.

• In Europe, some aim to restrict climate change discussions, citing the need to prevent false information.
• Critics argue this is an attempt to silence unfavorable viewpoints.

The Complexity of the Issue

The debate is multifaceted, encompassing:

• Science
• Politics
• Economics
• Culture

At its core, it's about:

• Who decides what's true?
• Who controls the conversation?