The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) recently shared a new set of guidelines for internal quality control (IQC) in labs. This update aims to translate the broad principles from the ISO 15189:2022 standard into practical steps. However, the guidelines have some significant flaws that might hinder their usefulness for lab professionals. Let's dive into the key issues.

First off, the guidelines struggle with how to design IQC strategies in today's world of traceability. This is a big deal because traceability is crucial for ensuring that lab results are accurate and reliable. The guidelines fall short in providing clear, up-to-date methods for achieving this.

Another major issue is how to set IQC acceptance limits. These limits are like the goalposts in a game; they define what's acceptable and what's not. The guidelines don't offer a solid, evidence-based approach for setting these limits, which is a missed chance to provide clear direction.

Estimating measurement uncertainty is another area where the guidelines stumble. Measurement uncertainty is like the margin of error in a survey; it tells you how confident you can be in the results. The guidelines don't provide a clear way to estimate this using IQC data, which is a crucial oversight.

Lastly, the guidelines don't address how to ensure that results from different analyzers in the same lab are comparable. This is important because labs often use multiple machines, and the results need to be consistent across all of them.

So, what's the bottom line? The guidelines have some serious gaps that need to be filled. A more systematic, updated, and evidence-based approach is needed to create IQC recommendations that truly benefit lab professionals. This is especially important given the IFCC's history of providing valuable guidance in this area.

Labs play a vital role in healthcare, and IQC is a key part of ensuring that lab results are accurate and reliable. It's crucial that guidelines for IQC are clear, up-to-date, and based on solid evidence. The recent guidelines from the IFCC have some significant shortcomings in these areas, but there's still time to improve them and provide the guidance that lab professionals need.

The Lab Quality Conundrum: A Fresh Look at Internal Quality Control

Actions