Imagine if you had to choose between helping people get medicine and keeping a roof over their heads. That's essentially what Proposition 34 is asking California voters to do this November. At first glance, it seems like the proposition is all about controlling how healthcare providers spend money. But dig a little deeper, and you'll find that it's actually about rent control.

The California Apartment Association has been pouring millions into supporting Proposition 34. Why? Because they want to stop the AIDS Healthcare Foundation from backing another measure called Proposition 33. That one is all about letting cities expand rent control. The apartment association thinks that the foundation is misusing money meant for patients to fund political campaigns and lobbying efforts.

The AIDS Healthcare Foundation, on the other hand, says this is just payback for their work on rent control. They provide HIV care and affordable housing, using a federal program to get discounted medicine. The apartment association thinks they're spending too much on politics and not enough on patients. But the foundation argues that their work helps keep people housed and healthy.

So, what do you think? Should healthcare providers be allowed to spend money on things like housing and politics, or should it all go towards patient care? It's a tricky question, and one that California voters will have to answer this November.

The Secret Battle Behind Proposition 34: Rent Control or Healthcare?

Actions