The Texas Senate Bill 17, signed into law in 2023, led to the closure of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) offices at public universities in Texas. This move has sparked a significant shift in how these institutions operate and think about their core mission.  The bill has forced universities to reevaluate their priorities and focus more on individual merit and academic achievement.

The idea that someone's race, gender, or any other demographic trait should overshadow their academic performance is a contentious one. A university degree is a personal achievement, not a group accomplishment. It is earned through hard work and dedication, not handed out based on group membership. The value of a degree lies in the effort and skill of the individual who earns it.

Ideas and individual performance should be the driving forces in education. Group membership can influence various aspects of life, but it should not replace merit, skill, or effort. Success in any field requires personal ability and commitment. Free will and its impact on success are unique to each individual and cannot be attributed to a group or organization.

DEI policies, while well-intentioned, can sometimes lead to unintended discrimination. They might favor one group over another, creating new forms of inequality. However, discrimination based on performance is essential in education. Universities must differentiate between excellent and average work, superior and mediocre efforts. Focusing on group membership rather than individual performance can be more harmful than requiring a loyalty oath.

Historical injustices are real, but using enforced equity as a solution to contemporary issues is not the answer. Universities should focus on providing equal opportunities rather than enforcing equity. DEI training often reinforces specific ideologies and can restrict free speech and thought. Universities should encourage diverse opinions and worldviews, treating everyone with dignity and respect.

Effective education involves open discussions about ethics, values, and moral frameworks. It cultivates independent, thoughtful individuals who can contribute meaningfully to society. Ideas, not ideologies, should be the focus.

There is a growing recognition that DEI initiatives have not always produced the desired results. Many prestigious institutions have stopped requiring DEI statements from faculty applicants. This shift highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to diversity and inclusion. Universities must address systemic inequities rather than relying on symbolic gestures. DEI strategies often fail to account for the unique needs and contexts of diverse individuals, substituting membership for performance.

A university should value every person, regardless of their role or background, as fundamentally unique yet equal. This approach defines excellence and ensures that education is fair and meaningful. The closure of DEI offices in Texas has forced universities to reevaluate their priorities and focus on what truly matters: individual merit and academic achievement.

The Shift in University Focus: Beyond Diversity

Actions