The US Supreme Court has chosen not to review a case brought by major tobacco companies against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The companies were arguing that the FDA’s rule requiring graphic health warnings on cigarette packages and ads violates their First Amendment rights. The FDA's rule, issued in 2020, demands that these warnings cover half the pack and 20% of ads. One of these warnings shows a lung with the message, "WARNING: Tobacco smoke causes fatal lung disease in nonsmokers. " Another features a child wearing an oxygen mask with the text, "WARNING: Tobacco smoke can harm your children. "

Initially, a Texas federal judge sided with the tobacco companies, but the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals overturned this decision. The appeals court stated that the rule meets the requirements set by the Supreme Court decades ago. These include being purely factual, uncontroversial, justified by a government interest, and not too burdensome. The case was sent back to the lower court for further review, but the tobacco companies appealed to the Supreme Court before this could happen.

Lawyers for the tobacco companies argued that these warnings are unlike any in US history and could lead to similar warnings on other products. They also claimed that the graphic images aim to shock rather than inform. The Biden administration, however, maintained that the warnings are necessary for public health awareness and not overly burdensome. They advised the Supreme Court not to intervene yet, as the trial court hasn't ruled on the FDA's rulemaking procedures. Despite this, the case might return to the Supreme Court after further lower court proceedings.

Tobacco Companies Lose Fight Against Cigarette Warning Labels

Actions