US Military Strikes on Drug Boats: Legal or Lethal?

83 Deaths Reported in Controversial Operations

The US military has been conducting strikes on boats suspected of drug trafficking, resulting in 83 deaths. Recent reports indicate that a second strike was ordered on a damaged boat with survivors, raising questions about the legality of these actions.

Double-Tap Strikes Under Scrutiny

A "double-tap" strike involves a second attack after the first. This method has faced criticism in the past, including during the Obama administration's drone strikes. The White House denies any wrongdoing, asserting that the strikes were in self-defense and adhered to international law.

Legal Concerns and War Crime Allegations

Legal experts have expressed concerns. Killing survivors who are no longer a threat could constitute a war crime or murder. However, some argue that the US is not in an official conflict with drug cartels, making the strikes extrajudicial killings.

Intent Behind the Second Strike

The intent behind the second strike is crucial. If it was to eliminate survivors, it would be illegal. If it was to sink the boat, it might be justified. Congress is investigating, but accountability seems unlikely.

Military Training and Legal Standards

The US military is trained not to harm noncombatants or prisoners. Yet, the situation is complex. Understanding the exact orders and communications is essential to determine the legality of the strikes.

Historical Context and Legal Prohibitions

Historically, targeting disabled enemies is prohibited. The current laws of war and the Geneva Convention forbid such actions. Criticism of the strikes comes from various legal experts and lawmakers.

Political Divide on the Issue

Some Republicans defend the strikes, questioning why the legality is being debated. However, there is no public evidence that the boats were carrying drugs or that those killed were given a fair trial.