politicsliberal
Use Frozen Russian Money for Ukraine’s Repair
Brussels, BelgiumTuesday, February 24, 2026
The Russian claim faces several obstacles. First, Moscow’s court is not the proper forum to resolve disputes about EU sanctions or frozen assets; those matters belong to international law and multilateral agreements. Second, Russia has no standing because the Central Bank is a state entity acting in its sovereign capacity, not as a private investor. Third, the merits of the case are weak because international bodies and United Nations resolutions have condemned Russia’s invasion and called for reparations. Fourth, any judgment in Moscow would be unenforced in Europe or the United States because EU law explicitly blocks enforcement of such awards. Fifth, Belgium and other EU members can counter‑claim for damages caused by Russia’s aggression.
In short, there is no real legal barrier to using the frozen Russian money for Ukraine. The main obstacle is political will. If European leaders decide to tap these assets, they would give Ukraine the funds it needs for reconstruction and also signal that Russia must pay reparations. This step would reinforce international law’s role in resolving conflict and help build a lasting peace.
Actions
flag content