JAY-Z's move to acquire full control over Roc-A-Fella Records has sparked controversy, with consequences that go beyond the world of hip-hop. The rap mogul's claim that copyright ownership of his debut album, Reasonable Doubt, will revert back to him in 2031 has far-reaching implications for those who stand to gain from the sale of Dame Dash's stake in the company. New York City lawyers are speaking out against JAY-Z's handling of the situation, calling it "extremely damaging" and vying for a pre-motion conference to stay the auction sale.

Gerald E. Singleton, an attorney representing the City, believes JAY-Z's statements are causing irreparable harm to the interests of those seeking funds from the sale. "Those statements are false and extremely damaging to the City's interests in ensuring that the auction will generate sufficient funds to satisfy all existing child support arrearages and secure future child support payments," Singleton wrote in a letter to Judge Robert W. Lehrburger.

As the drama unfolds, Roc-A-Fella is facing increased scrutiny for withholding critical royalty information. Singleton has suggested that the company's actions could lead to motions for turnover orders being filed against them. "The auction should be conducted in a manner that will bring the highest price for the benefit of affected judgment creditors," he emphasized.

Dame Dash, the co-founder of Roc-A-Fella, has weighed in on the controversy, denying JAY-Z's claims and alleging that his statements have "poisoned the environment for the auction." Dash claims that JAY-Z has no termination right under the Copyright Act and that Roc-A-Fella is entitled to the renewal term. This means that the company will continue to own the copyright rights until 2098, potentially increasing the auction price tenfold.

What's at Stake: JAY-Z's Quest for Roc-A-Fella Control

Actions