Imagine you're in a classroom, and the teacher is saying one thing, but the kids sitting at the front are giving you totally different ideas. That's kind of like what's happening with Trump's science advisors.

When Trump started his second term, he picked a few experts to help him with science stuff. Now, you might think these folks would be all about facts and evidence, but that's not always the case. Let's look at one example: climate change. Some of these advisors aren't too sure about whether humans are to blame. That's a bit strange, right? It's like they're ignoring what most scientists have figured out.

But wait, it gets more interesting. These advisors can sway Trump's decisions on big topics, like rules about pollution and funding for research. So, if they're not on the same page as most scientists, things could get a little wonky. For instance, stricter rules on factories might not happen, or money for studying climate change could take a dip.

It's not just about one topic, though. These advisors can influence loads of stuff, from medicine to technology. And because they're close to Trump, their voices carry a lot of weight. So, their opinions can shape how policies are made and what gets prioritized.

But here's where it gets curious. Sometimes, these advisors ignore or downplay science that doesn't fit their views. That's not how science is supposed to work, right? It's about facts and evidence, not just what sounds good.

So, what's the deal? Shouldn't the president's science team be all about facts and evidence? It's something to think about. Because when science gets ignored or twisted, it can affect everyone.

What's Up with Trump's Science Team?

Actions