When Legal Papers Hide Dark Truths
The U.S. Justice Department has recently granted the military a secret immunity pass, stating that soldiers will not face charges for sinking boats in the Caribbean and Pacific. These actions have resulted in the deaths of at least 80 people. However, the question arises: why does the government need to promise immunity if these acts are truly legal?
A Long Trend of Legal Tricks
This isn't an isolated incident. Over decades, U.S. leaders have employed legal maneuvers to justify questionable actions.
- Bush Administration: Redefined torture.
- Obama Administration: Used similar methods to justify drone strikes.
- Trump Administration: Now using missiles to destroy boats suspected of drug trafficking.
There's no declared war. No trials take place. The Pentagon labels these killings as "lawful orders." But is this truly justice?
Allies and Military Officers Raise Concerns
Allies like the UK have recognized the issue, halting intelligence sharing for these missions. Within the military, officers are losing their moral compass, relying too heavily on legal approvals. They believe that if lawyers say it's okay, it must be. However, legality doesn't always equate to morality.
The Danger of "Lawful Orders"
The phrase "lawful orders" has become a shield to avoid responsibility, allowing individuals to ignore their conscience. The military's culture of obedience rewards those who follow orders without question, making it difficult for leaders to challenge wrongful commands.
Military Silence Speaks Volumes
During Trump's speech at Quantico, generals remained silent, indicating their willingness to follow illegal orders to avoid conflict. Their duty, however, is to defend the Constitution, not merely obey a president.
The Erosion of Respect
A nation's strength lies not just in power but in the wise use of that power. The rule of law once made the U.S. military respected. Now, that respect is fading—not due to defeat, but due to surrender. No legal document can rectify that.
