Taxpayers might be surprised to learn that a big chunk of the money given to universities for medical research doesn't actually go to finding cures. Instead, it covers what are called "indirect costs. " These costs are so vague that they can pay for things like professor salaries, office parties, and even diversity offices. This isn't a new issue. It's been going on for decades.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) spent over 35 billion dollars last year on research grants. Out of this, a whopping 9 billion dollars went to these indirect costs. That's almost a third of the total spending. To put this into perspective, private foundations often don't pay for these indirect costs at all. Even the Gates Foundation only pays up to 10 percent.

So, why does the federal government pay so much more? And why are universities, some with massive endowments, not covering these costs themselves? For years, no one had a good answer. But recently, the federal government capped the maximum indirect cost rate at 15 percent. This means more money can go directly to research.

Imagine if universities with billions in endowments, like Harvard and Yale, used their own money to cover these costs. Harvard's endowment grew by around 5 billion dollars last year. Yale's by 2. 3 billion. Both universities could easily cover their indirect costs with their endowment income. So, why aren't they?

This isn't just about money. It's about priorities. Universities should be focusing on research, not bloated administrative costs. And taxpayers should be funding critical research, not office parties and diversity offices.

The new cap on indirect costs is a step in the right direction. It's fair, generous, and will allow more funding to go directly to critical research. By removing bloated administrative costs and forcing large money-making endowments to pay their fair share, the government can increase the number of research grants. This means more research on cancer, heart disease, and even nutrition.

The United States has the best medical research in the world. It's vital that as many funds as possible go directly towards scientific research rather than administrative overhead.

Where Does Your Tax Money Go? The Surprising Truth About University Research Funding

Actions