opinionliberal
Who Should Really Pay for Climate Change?
California, USAWednesday, July 9, 2025
Advertisement
Advertisement
California's Largest Insurer, State Farm, Increases Rates and Seeks Further Hikes
- Homeowners: 17% increase
- Renters and Condo Owners: 15% increase
- Apartment Owners: 38% increase
- Proposed Further Increase: 11% for all residential properties
Other Insurance Companies Follow Suit
- Seeking rate hikes
- Leaving the state altogether
Who's Really to Blame?
Insurance Companies Should Target the Oil and Gas Industry
- Known for decades that fossil fuels cause climate change
- Instead of passing costs to homeowners, insurers should sue Big Oil and Gas
The Impact of Fossil Fuel Companies
Recent Study Published in Nature
- 111 fossil fuel companies caused $28 trillion in climate damage (1991-2020)
- Chevron: $1.98 trillion in economic losses
- ExxonMobil: $1.91 trillion in economic losses
- BP: $1.45 trillion in economic losses
Oil and Gas Industry Profits
- Over $1 trillion in the past decade alone
Insurance Companies' Role
Power to Hold Companies Accountable
- Climate change has led to $600 billion in insurance losses over two decades
- Climate-related disasters account for nearly 40% of the industry's total losses
Conflict of Interest
- Insurance companies heavily invested in fossil fuels
- Solution: Insurers should divest from fossil fuels
The Burden on California Property Owners
- Can't afford to shoulder the burden alone
- Call to Action: Insurance companies must hold Big Oil and Gas accountable
Actions
flag content