Will the Sounds of Sirens Silence Students' Fears?

The debate over school resource officers (SROs) at Waukegan High School has students, parents, and community members feeling uneasy about the lack of a deal between the city and school district. For nearly two weeks, negotiations have been ongoing, but the two sides remain $40,000 apart. As classes started, some students reported feeling unsafe without SROs on campus. The high crime rate in the city, with an average of more than four incidents in schools each month, has raised concerns about student safety. Having police officers on campus could alleviate some of these fears, according to nonvoting student members of the board, Melanie Rosales and Brianna Bravo. However, the city's request for $350,000 to cover the costs of placing SROs on two campuses, and the school district's offer of $150,000, have left both parties far apart. The city's willingness to drop its request to $260,000, approximately $30,000 less than the prorated salary, insurance, and pension costs for eight months of work, has still not resolved the issue.

Ray Vukovich, a former school board member, criticized both city and school officials for not working together to settle the contract. He emphasized that the kids need to feel safe in school and that the delay in resolving the issue is unacceptable. The debate highlights the complexities of the issue, with pension costs being the main stumbling block. According to Superintendent Theresa Plascencia, the district was willing to pay $5,000 more than the pension cost for municipal workers, but the city's pension rate is significantly higher due to a pension shortfall. Citing a statewide mandate, Waukegan Mayor Ann Taylor explained that the amount of pension contributions is dictated by the mandate, and that the amounts required for police officers, firefighters, and other municipal workers – including some school employees – are not the same. As the debate continues, the question remains: what do students, parents, and community members want? Do they want SROs on campus for safety, or are there alternative solutions to ensure student safety? What if the assumption that SROs are the only solution to student safety is wrong? What might the author have missed?

Actions